Study suggests less conformity leads to more innovation – Phys.org


Forget Password?
Learn more
share this!
486
Twit
Share
Email
May 23, 2024
This article has been reviewed according to Science X’s editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content’s credibility:
fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
proofread
by Complexity Science Hub
Sociodiversity—the diversity of human opinions, ideas, and behaviors—is a driving force behind many positive developments.
“When different people come together, given they have no bad intentions, emerge, which can foster innovation and contribute to ,” explains Dirk Helbing, who is an external faculty member at the Complexity Science Hub and a professor at ETH Zurich. Therefore, maintaining or even promoting sociodiversity plays a significant role. But how can this be achieved?
In a study recently published in the Journal of the Royal Society Open Science, Helbing and his colleague found evidence that sociodiversity is lower in centralized social networks, where a few key figures are connected with a lot of people.
In reality, networks are highly centralized, especially on platforms like Instagram and X, where it is possible to have a large following and where some celebrities have many followers, according to the researchers. Most people in these networks have comparatively few followers, while a select few command substantial numbers.
“This is further reinforced by the fact that people who already have many followers are more visible and quickly gain even more followers,” says Andrea Musso from CSH and ETH. This so-called Matthew effect—also known as “rich-get-richer effect”—increases centralization in the network. In turn, centralization destroys the niches protecting minority opinions. Accordingly, centralization reduces sociodiversity, finds the study.
“In centralized social networks, minority opinions are easily crowded out by majority opinions. This can sometimes mean that valuable ideas are lost, while mainstream takes over. That, however, is no guarantee for good solutions,” explains Helbing. “In fact, social networks should offer safe spaces, where new ideas can develop without having to enter competition with the mainstream right away.”
“When people are part of a group that shares their beliefs, new ideas can survive for a longer time. Otherwise, it is likely that they end up conforming with the majority. Then, however, innovation doesn’t have a chance,” states Musso. “Importantly, such group support depends on a person’s social network rather than on how widely the idea is accepted overall.”
“Networks that promote sociodiversity have structural features that protect minority opinions,” Helbing concludes.
Unfollowing VIPs
“So, if we want to promote sociodiversity, we should decentralize social networks,” suggests Musso. Take, for instance, platforms such as Meta or X.
“It turns out that a simple action, such as unfollowing a few VIPs, meaning some influential people with a lot of followers, can help to promote sociodiversity,” explains Helbing.
Over time, this can lead to a richer range of ideas, more innovation, economic prosperity, resilience against societal disruptions, and collective intelligence.
For their study, the researchers created a new method to understand a network’s ability to foster sociodiversity, i.e., to grasp how good a network is at providing space for minority opinions. They validated the method by using a simple model of how opinions change: people can either take over the opinion of a network neighbor (imitate) or invent a new opinion (innovate).
The study found that different networks may display radically different levels of socio-diversity, even when the rates of imitation and innovation are the same. Importantly, their novel method can predict these differences well.
First, the researchers tested the method’s predictive power on synthetic networks—networks generated through models.
“Synthetic networks offer the advantage that we can change relevant parameters as we like. For instance, we can create heavily centralized networks in the computer by connecting most elements with a select few ‘central’ elements. Alternatively, we can decentralize the network by interconnecting its elements randomly,” explains Musso.
Subsequently, the researchers evaluated their method across more than a hundred real social networks, drawn from platforms like Meta or X.
“The results of this study have important implications for how opinion diversity can be sustained or even increased,” explains Helbing.
The authors emphasize that formation is indeed not the only example where the behavior of a system depends on the network structure. The occurrence of harmful cascading effects, the spread of diseases, the efficiency of traffic patterns and their emission levels, the effectiveness of disaster response operations, and the emergence of cooperation are all examples where the outcome is largely determined by the interaction network.
“These dependencies are often counter-intuitive,” says Helbing. “This makes network theory and the science of complex dynamical systems such an exciting research area.”
More information: Andrea Musso et al, How networks shape diversity for better or worse, Royal Society Open Science (2024). DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230505

Journal information: Royal Society Open Science

Journal information: Royal Society Open Science
Provided by Complexity Science Hub
Explore further
Facebook
Twitter
Email
Feedback to editors
17 hours ago
0
17 hours ago
0
19 hours ago
0
May 28, 2024
0
May 28, 2024
0
8 hours ago
10 hours ago
10 hours ago
10 hours ago
11 hours ago
11 hours ago
12 hours ago
12 hours ago
13 hours ago
13 hours ago
3 hours ago
4 hours ago
5 hours ago
8 hours ago
9 hours ago
May 29, 2024
More from Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Feb 10, 2022
May 22, 2018
Apr 15, 2021
Dec 1, 2023
Dec 8, 2023
Oct 6, 2021
17 hours ago
13 hours ago
16 hours ago
May 29, 2024
May 29, 2024
May 29, 2024
Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form. For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines).
Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request
Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.
Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.
Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient’s address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form.

Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we’ll never share your details to third parties.
More information Privacy policy
We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X’s mission by getting a premium account.
Medical research advances and health news
The latest engineering, electronics and technology advances
The most comprehensive sci-tech news coverage on the web

source

Oh hi there 👋
It’s nice to meet you.

Sign up to receive awesome content in your inbox, every month.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *